For those of us in the field of education, some would argue that there are fewer and fewer reasons to be grateful during this holiday season. Indeed, education budgets and resources have been slashed, and teachers are often asked to do more in their classrooms with less. The challenges are greater, and teachers are stretched thin. As of late, these are the very challenges that have been the focus of my gratitude.


Over the last several months, I have traveled to first grade classrooms supporting the implementation of the IFL TeacherMate System. My purpose is three-fold: support teachers one-on-one in the implementation of the TeacherMate System, address and support the quality of instruction in the literacy block to ensure that best practices are being used and that differentiated instruction is at the core, and, lastly, to define the model of support that is most successful for educators as we at IFL seek to replicate our successes elsewhere. I am grateful to be part of this initiative, and the teachers I have met continue to inspire me every day.


It is my belief that teachers are at the core of the students' learning experience. First grade teachers, in particular, are carefully growing independent thinkers, nurturing early literacy skills, and laying the foundations for lifelong learning. They also teach kids how to tie their shoes, zip their coats, take responsibility for actions and assignments, and understand what it means to be a good friend. It is in these challenging environments that I encounter moments of joy each day.


The teachers with whom I've been fortunate to work are dedicated, tenacious, and kind. Every day, these folks juggle the constant demands of assessment and the diversity of many learning levels in one classroom with grace and poise. They find resources (or make them!), adapt curriculums, adjust instruction, and differentiate instruction. They encourage students to participate in learning and to act independently. Those who do it best have established classroom routines that focus on student responsibility.


Differentiated Instruction is the buzzword of late and, although its importance is widely supported, it has almost become cliché. When it comes to differentiation, it is in the first grade classroom where the rubber meets the road. Educators differentiate everything! Dedicated teachers not only differentiate literacy and math instruction (with flexible grouping and standards-based instruction, of course), but they also differentiate behavior modification techniques and strategies. They differentiate the complexity of their language and differentiate their expectations for each student. There is no doubt that we ask a lot of our educators: treat each student individually and make sure all achieve.


Every day, educators across the country are rising to that challenge. And to those educators, I am grateful. I'm grateful for the teachers who treat students individually, with kindness and support, and who help students grow more independent each day. I'm grateful for the teachers who invite me into their classrooms, where I, too, never stop learning. I'm grateful for the opportunity to help teachers differentiate through technology using the TeacherMates. But, mostly, I'm grateful for educators who show students everyday that they are important, worthwhile, and bright! These teachers shine in a sea of challenges that is the modern educational experience.


Thank you, Teachers, for all that you do!


Rwanda

| 1 Comment


What struck me most about my recent visit to Rwanda is how far Rwanda has distanced itself from the horrific genocide in 1994, while at the same time the genocide's aftermath is still felt on a daily basis. It's a contradiction that is hard to fathom.


Almost everyone in Rwanda has a first-hand story of how the genocide fundamentally altered their lives. Genocide memorials are ubiquitous, bodies of the victims are still being identified, and perpetrators are still being investigated and prosecuted. The ripples of one of the worst tragedies of the 20th Century touch everything in 21st Century Rwanda.


And yet, as fresh and raw as the wounds still are 15 years later, Rwanda has progressed so far in so many ways - economic development and growth, governmental and political stability, infrastructure -- that it seems almost miraculous that so much progress has occurred so fast. And the most amazing part of this progress is that the foundation for it has been the unity of it's people! There is an unmistakable sense of everyone working together toward the same goals that, to an American, seems so utterly refreshing that it is impossible not to be optimistic about Rwanda's future.


Which is why Innovations for Learning has chosen Rwanda as it's first country outside the US to devote substantial resources. Rwanda's stated goal is to achieve 100 percent literacy in English in this decade, which is particularly audacious considering that only a small percentage of the population currently can speak English fluently. However, based on it's accomplishments in other areas, I'm betting on Rwanda's success.


IFL has offered to assist Rwanda in it's literacy goal by providing our TeacherMate System in elementary classrooms in collaboration with Open Learning Exchange, an NGO with a center in Kigali. The Ministry of Education has approved our first efforts that will start in the 2011 school year. We will soon be translating all of our stories into Kinyarwanda, the local language, to support English learning as a second language, in the same way we use Spanish as a support language in the US.


The world is watching Rwanda's progress, and we are very excited to lend a hand. For those who believe that anything is possible, Rwanda now is a Mecca for faith in human progress. Stay tuned.


Innovations for Learning is proud to announce that it was chosen by the Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop as a semi-finalist in its prize competition for Innovation Breakthroughs in Mobile Learning.  The Cooney Center is one of the most respected organizations promoting research and innovation in digital education, and it is an honor to be recognized by the distinguished team of judges they assembled for this prize.  Thank you, Cooney Center and Sesame Workshop!

Though I still have so much to learn, three fundamental truths are clear to me after a dozen years in education reform: 

 

1.)   There are no silver bullets capable of solving a problem as complex and devastating as the crisis in U.S. K-12 education.  How deep is this crisis?  A recent Annie E. Casey Foundation Report estimates that 50% of low-income 4th graders are "below basic" in reading.

 

2.)   Despite truth # 1, popular sentiment in education reform swings to and from the latest, greatest silver bullet (basic math, whole language, smaller class sizes, etc.) with alarming frequency.  This trend is a serious impediment to real progress in education reform.

 

3.)   This "pendulum" of popular sentiment is currently swinging towards education technology as the next silver bullet to close the achievement gap in low-income schools.  This is a real cause for concern.

 

The last truth might strike you as odd coming from a guy who just joined an education technology company, but Innovations for Learning is not your typical education technology company.  Allow me to explain.

 

The increasingly pervasive idea that technology alone can fix public education in low-income communities where parents and other adults are often absent in--or detrimental to--the lives of children is misguided.  The reality is that the human resources in our communities and schools are more important than ever, and technology alone will never close the achievement gap between affluent and low-income schools.  Though I am absolutely thrilled by the prospect of what the technology of tomorrow might do to improve student learning--more specifically, the potential of developing adaptive learning platforms that are truly adaptive (they will know what kids know, what they don't know, and how they learn best)--my enthusiasm is grounded in my belief that the thoughtful combination of both humans and technology will ultimately do the most for students.

 

And while I can't claim it as a fundamental truth, I can honestly say that I believe that Innovations for Learning's Teacher Mate Handheld Computer System offers the most powerful marriage of people and technology presently available to low-income students, their teachers, schools, and families.

 

Though I'm told brevity is the key to blogging, for those who would care to read on for the back-story, I'm more than happy to elaborate.

 

My two years as a fifth grade teacher in a low-income community south of San Francisco were a humility contest.  My greatest challenge was figuring out how to effectively serve 24 students with 24 very different educational needs--one student at a kindergarten reading level, one student at an 7th grade reading level, and 22 students who were somewhere in between.  The importance of differentiating instruction was constantly reinforced in the ten years that I led Resources for Indispensable Schools and Educators (RISE), where we worked hard to recognize and retain teachers who were standouts early in their careers--teachers who knew what each of their students knew, what they didn't know, how they learned best, and differentiated their instruction accordingly.

 

That being said, Innovations for Learning's TeacherMate Handheld Computer System is a real step in the direction of our realizing the potential of both humans and technology to close the achievement gap in our low-income schools.  The Teacher Mate's powerful software delivers students early literacy and numeracy content that is tied to an individual teacher's curriculum and adjusted to an individual student's pace.  The TeacherMate provides teachers with numerous data points about student performance, which in turn allows that student's curriculum to be adjusted and revised, accordingly, and in real time.  All of this happens during the school week, alongside more traditional educational tools.  In this way, students that are ahead of the day's lesson can forge further ahead, while those that are behind have a powerful resource with which to signal their progress and get caught up.  The TeacherMate platform is currently available on a focused handheld device resembling a Nintendo Game Boy, and is coming soon to the Apple Operating System, Google's Android, and the devices of tomorrow.

 

In short, Innovations for Learning is harnessing technology's current capabilities to help teachers, tutors, and parents alike differentiate instruction--helping them know what kids know, what they don't know, and you guessed it, how they learn best. 

 

We at Innovations for Learning have a lot to learn ourselves, and like the students we serve, with a lot of hard work we will improve a great deal over time.  So please don't expect the TeacherMate or our next innovation to be perfect right away.  Doing so just might help send the pendulum back in the opposite direction towards another non-existent silver bullet.

 

But we need look no further than this blog for yet another powerful example of humans and technology.  To all the humans out there, thanks for reading [and I don't say that lightly given the (il)literacy statistic noted with truth #1 above] and thanks in advance for your thoughts. And to all the technology out there, thank you for delivering my message.

TeacherMates in Palestine

| 1 Comment
palestinian_girls.jpg
I am visiting six Palestinian schools with Teachermate devices loaded with critical thinking math games and executive function assessment games along with other educational content in Arabic.  The purpose of my first visit to Palestine is multifold. The first is to introduce mobile learning technology-based educational resources to resource-deprived schools in Palestine, as part of my ongoing research around the globe.  I have visited mountain regions and urban slums in Latin America and extreme rural villages in India and jungles in Africa to conduct mobile learning research designed to mitigate the digital divide in marginalized communities around the world. My second purpose is to initiate a global storytelling project which involves sharing and understanding of children's life stories from multiple countries. I read stories collected from children living in regions such as Indian rural villages or Uganda refugee camps and also collect stories with TeacherMate's StoryMaker program I developed for children. The third purpose is to measure Palestine children's general digital competency, literacy, math proficiency, and executive function skill under the constant psychological trauma that many of the Palestine children experience on a daily basis. I met with the Minister of Education and Higher Education, former Minister of Telecommunication, Berzeit University officials, and various school operators and NGO administrators to discuss how my projects can be scaled up.
I was surprised to find that children attending public schools located close to the fence between Israelis and Palestinians or near Israeli settlements build quite strong resentment and hate from early childhood. I found that the personal life stories that children as young as 8 years old share in storytelling workshops are quite shocking and sobering. I also found that children living in such conditions demonstrate poor executive functions and low academic performance. 

Mobile technology is a highly viable educational option that is exciting and fun for Palestine children and I wish to continue my research in Palestine as conditions permit. My hope is that mobile technology can be used to mitigate the digital divide, promote peace and a sense of global community, and educate marginalized children in the region.  
 

I am often asked, why is Innovations for Learning a nonprofit organization? It sells products and charges for services, why is it not a for-profit company?


Glad you asked, because I can utilize my 25 years of corporate law knowledge (now mostly lying fallow) to answer this.


The form of an enterprise should follow its capital needs. A mature business with enormous capital needs should be a public company. Public company shareholders require quarterly results that put these companies on the tightest of timetables. Companies with goals 3-5 years out can be venture-capital backed, for that is how long the VC will last before requiring a "liquidity event". Companies with multi-generation goals should be family-owned businesses. Nonprofits lie at the very end of this continuum: the "capital" it receives from grants is the most patient capital of all: it NEVER needs to be returned.


Why do education companies need such patient capital? Because the education marketplace is one of the most fragmented industries in America, and the sales cycles are brutally long. Almost all of the customers are themselves nonprofits, with various levels of bureaucracy impeding each sale.


For this reason, even the largest companies serving public education are often nonprofit. The larger for-proft companies have mostly merged or folded.


If we were for-profit, we would have likely folded by now as well. But we are here for the very long term, as are our customers, and as are our philanthropic funders. This alignment of our corporate form with our customers and funders fosters the sustainability we need to make long-term improvements in public education.


 

Innovations for Learning - "Tech Kids" from Innovations for Learning on Vimeo.

Administrators, funders, policy makers and educators often highlight the importance of "bridging the digital divide" and "making our students computer literate" to justify large technology expenditures in the schools.  Unquestionably, students need exposure to computers to prepare for the digital future, but how much technology needs to be purchased to accomplish this goal? 

And to what extent does focusing on this goal take away from the very real potential of integrating technology into the everyday curriculum of the classroom in service of basic literacy and math instruction?  

To highlight the concern that technology is underused in schools to improve basic education, I created this short video.  Please share with your friends and colleagues, and let me know what you think.

Apple Inc. is one of the most admired companies on the planet. Count me as one of its top admirers. What I admire most is the way Apple considers holistically the entire experience of owning and using a computer. Apple has painstakingly thought through the buying experience, the training experience, the support experience, the maintenance experience, and the user experience. By providing the hardware and the software, the services and the support, Apple can provide the consumer with a total experience that far surpasses the competition.


 

Somewhat ironically, given Apple's historical strength in the education market, Apple does not extend this holistic experience to the classroom. While Apple serves the adult consumer with Apple software (from the iLife and iWork suites), it does not serve the instructional needs of schools. Instead, Apple relies on third parties to develop applications that are used by students in schools.


It's too bad, because the same logic that extends to the adult consumer experience applies with even greater force to the young student experience. The appropriateness and effectiveness of the software is greatly influenced by the design of the hardware, as well as by the support and training.


Hence Innovations for Learning. We have one focus: early elementary classrooms. We have tailored our hardware, our software, our training, and our support to the unique needs of little hands and the short attention spans of students as well as to teachers' hectic schedules, their need for integrated curriculum, and their limited appetite for computer troubleshooting.


We are a service company, not a product company. Our service is designed to improve the entire teaching and learning experience through innovation that is intensively researched and developed and effectively implemented on a scalable basis.


When people remark that TeacherMates are the 'iPods of education', I consider them right in more ways than they know.


Open Learning Exchange (OLE) is committed to universal access to basic education by 2015.

Over one billion school-aged children in more than one hundred countries lack access to even the most essential learning opportunities. Enabling them to acquire at least a basic education is not charity - it is a universal right. Every child is entitled to an opportunity to develop an intellectually and economically strong life consistent with their abilities. This ultimately benefits all of us.

And it is now possible as never before. The global reach of the Internet, low-cost laptops and other information technologies, combined with a greater awareness of the importance of universal basic education, make it possible for this to be achieved by the UN Millennium Goal of 2015.

 

 

IMG_4747_800.jpgFrom time to time, a reporter, prospective funder, or administrator will come to one of our classrooms for a site visit. Most often, the first questions will be addressed to the teacher, but, after awhile, the interviewer will turn to the students. Invariably, the first question to the students is "what do you like about TeacherMate?" Expecting the answer to be "it's fun!" the interviewer is always surprised when the response is either "it helps me learn to read" or "it helps me with math."


Suspicious that perhaps the activities are not as fun as they first appear, the interviewer will then ask: "which do you like more, TeacherMate or Nintendo?" Nine times out of ten, the student chooses TeacherMate.


Disbelief on the part of the interviewer ensues.


Trust these children. Playing at home, they prefer Nintendo. But they know when it's time for pure fun and when it's time for fun to be subservient to learning. They know how little they learn with workbooks or by sitting in the back of a large class, when they are bored and acting out.


Our goal as educators is to tap into a child's natural desire to learn; to stoke it, and make it habitual before that desire is snuffed out by the hardships of growing up, hardships which are accentuated in low income communities. Technology can serve that goal, if the program designers keep that goal in the top of their minds.